-
摘要: 摘要:【目的】技术的快速发展促使人类重新审视人类与机器之间的关系。【方法】基于对哲学探究、艺术创作和社会人类学分析,结合作者的实践,从后现象学论点和技术和社会技术的人类学历史这两个角度分别探讨人类和技术的关系。【结果】【结论】通过分析和思考,笔者认为技术的发展使人类产生了依赖性和替代性,为人类进化的动态和持续叙事做出了贡献。人类与技术之间的界限变得模糊,这揭示了一种复杂而相互依存的共同进化,这种进化塑造了人类的经验和技术进步的轨迹。
-
[1] Martina Hessler,"TECHNO-HUMANITY:A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology",Icon 24(2018): 69, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26750539. [2] 贝蒂 - 鲍威尔,“笛卡尔的机器”,《亚里士多德学 会 会 议 录 》71(1970 年 ):209, http://www.jstor.org/ stable/4544809. [3] 机 器 会 思 考 吗? [EB/OL].http:// pioneer.chula. ac.th/~pukrit/bba/lecture5.pdf.2023-08-02/2023-09-23. [4] 莫里斯·梅洛·庞蒂,自己身体的空间性与运动性 [M]. 知觉现象学,牛津:Routledge, 2014. [5] 梅洛·庞蒂 . 自己身体的空间性和运动性 . 168 . [6] [7] Peter-Paul Verbeek, "Cyborg Intentionality: Rethinkingthe Phenomenologyof Human-Technology Relations,"Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7, no.3 (2008):388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008- 9099-x. [8] James Miller,The Fourth Screen:Mediatization and the Smartphone, Mobile Media & Communication 2, no. 2 (2014):214. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914521412.4 [9] [10]Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, “Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations, 389. [11] ChatGPT, 回应 “现象学中背景关系的例子”[EB/OL]. https://chat.openai.com/chat.2023-07-16. [12] [13] Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, "Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations, 389. [14] [15]Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations,391. [16] Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations,391. [17] Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, "Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations," 392.6 [18] Verbeek, Cyborg intentionality:Verbeek, "Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human technology relations,391. [19] 袁慕晗 . 身体与技术的融合:可穿戴设备的后现象学方法(未发表手稿,2022 年 5 月 23 日),排版稿。 [20] Robert F G. Spier, From the Hand of Man:原始和前工业技 术 .(波士顿:霍顿 - 米夫林公司,1970 年), 第 2 页。 [21] Bryan Pfaffenberger,技术的社会人类学 . 人类学年度评 论 [J].1992 (1):498. [22] [23] Bryan Pfaffenberger. 技术的社会人类学 [J]. 人类学年 度 评 论 ,1992(1 ):497. [24] Bryan Pfaffenberger. 技术的社会人类学 [J]. 人类学年度评 论,1992 (1)::498, [25] [26 ] Thomas Peter Hughes, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993:14. [27] Bryan Pfaffenberger. 技术的社会人类学 [J]. 人类学年度评 论 ,1992 (1):498. [28] John Law,"On the Social Explanation of Technical Change[J]. 技 术与文化,1987(2): 227-52. [29] Martina Hessler,"TECHNO-HUMANITY:A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology",Icon 24(2018):67, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26750539. [30] Hessler, "TECHNO-HUMANITY: A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology," 65. [31] [32]Hessler, "TECHNO-HUMANITY: A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology," 69. [33] [34] Hessler, "TECHNO-HUMANITY: A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology," 70. [35] [36][37][38] Hessler, "TECHNO-HUMANITY: A Plea for a Historical Anthropology of Technology," 70-73. [39] [40][41][42][43] Don Ihde and Lambros Malafouris, "Homo Faber Revisited:后现象学与物质参与理论 [J]. 哲学与技 术,2018( 32 ):195–214.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 190
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0